United States v. Reginald T. Rembert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that photographic evidence “can be admitted as evidence independent of the testimony of any witness as to the events depicted, upon a foundation sufficient to meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 901(a)”
• upholding decision to admit photographs taken by surveillance camera authenticated by circumstantial evidence about occurrences at bank and by testimony “as to the loading of the cameras and the security of the film,” and “internal indicia of date, place, and event depicted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).