United States v. Reginald Levi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, while the sentencing guidelines and commentary are \laws\ for purposes of ex post facto analysis, some policy statements are not
• noting ex post facto analysis assumes the court is construing the effects of a penal \law\
• finding it premature to decide the qualified immunity issue 3 “because whether the officers may be said to have made a ‘reasonable mistake’ of fact or law may 4 depend on the jury’s resolution of disputed facts and the inferences it draws therefrom”
• “[T]he provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not 3 limited to prisoners.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).