United States v. Reginald K. Townsend

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When there is no ambiguity in the charging documents or in the statutory definition of the crime, it is not necessary to undertake a factual review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Upton
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-01-09· cited 57×
• United States v. O'Connor
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-09-01· cited 41×
• United States v. Douglas M. Thigpen
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-09-06· cited 38×
• United States v. Thigpen, Douglas M.
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-08-07
• United States v. Upton, Tavon A.
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-01-09

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Booker
  Supreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
• Shepard v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2005-03-07· cited 4,574×
• United States v. Dewayne Lewis
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-05-16· cited 98×
• United States v. Amin W. Williams
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-06-09· cited 72×