Skip to main content
· 8/19/2005

United States v. Reginald K. Townsend

Citations

  • 419 F.3d 663
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17605
  • 2005 WL 1994103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When there is no ambiguity in the charging documents or in the statutory definition of the crime, it is not necessary to undertake a factual review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.