United States v. Reginald J. Holzer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although our Court of Appeals ordered that result without expressly discussing the double jeopardy issue
• “[A] jury is presumed to act rationally, and a rational jury would convict a defendant of racketeering . . . [e]ven if it had exonerated [him] of all the predicate offenses charged except one act of extortion and one receipt of a bribe.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).