United States v. Reggie Booker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a lab analyst opined that the substance was “crack”
• chemical tests as well as coconspirator and officer testimony were “overwhelming proof that the drugs were crack.”
• “[S]cientifically, ‘cocaine base’ includes other forms of the drug besides crack cocaine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).