United States v. Reevey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “exceptions are the only authority a district court has to depart below a mandatory minimum” (quoting Kellum, 356 F.3d at 289)
• “The [Fair Sentencing Act] does not contain an express statement that the increase in the amount of crack cocaine triggering the five-year mandatory minimum is to be applied to crimes committed before the [Fair Sentencing Act’s] effective date.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).