Skip to main content
· 3/25/2009

United States v. Recla

Citations

  • 560 F.3d 539
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6075
  • 2009 WL 763594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating sentence because the district court may have considered plans to file a Rule 35(b) motion when the court referenced “subsequent motions” in its announcement of sentence
  • “When the sentencing court considers an impermissible factor in calculating a defendant’s sentence, a reviewing court will vacate and remand for resentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Clay, Kethledge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.