United States v. Rebollar-Bautista

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding due process violation where defendant doctor “both ignored significant exculpatory evidence and manufactured a false or reckless diagnosis” (emphasis in original)
• finding due process violation where plaintiffs were without custody of their three infant children for nearly ten months following a court-ordered removal and defendant doctor “both ignored significant exculpatory evidence and manufactured a false or reckless diagnosis”
• “The Second Circuit has yet to decide definitively the appropriate standard by which to assess the reasonableness of a seizure in the context of a child abuse investigation.”
• “[W]hen the facts upon which the judicial tribunal relies are themselves false or misleading, court confirmation will not suffice to show that the caseworker's conduct had an objectively reasonable basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).