Skip to main content
· 10/17/2007

United States v. Razmilovic

Citations

  • 507 F.3d 130
  • 2007 WL 3011042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “instructing the jury about the possibility of reaching a partial verdict” is one alternative to a mistrial that we consider under manifest necessity review
  • finding no waiver when defendant orally joined motion for mistrial but withdrew motion before judge discharged the jury
  • considering “what actions, if any, the trial judge took prior to declaring a mistrial to help [him] determine whether the jury [were] genuinely deadlocked”
  • identifying several factors that guide review of whether jury was deadlocked
  • a district court’s declaration of a mistrial on grounds of manifest necessity is reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • “When a defendant moves for or consents to a mistrial, the Double Jeopardy Clause usually imposes no bar to retrying that defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner, Katzmann, Murtha

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.