· 10/17/2007
United States v. Razmilovic
Citations
- 507 F.3d 130
- 2007 WL 3011042
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “instructing the jury about the possibility of reaching a partial verdict” is one alternative to a mistrial that we consider under manifest necessity review
- finding no waiver when defendant orally joined motion for mistrial but withdrew motion before judge discharged the jury
- considering “what actions, if any, the trial judge took prior to declaring a mistrial to help [him] determine whether the jury [were] genuinely deadlocked”
- identifying several factors that guide review of whether jury was deadlocked
- a district court’s declaration of a mistrial on grounds of manifest necessity is reviewed for abuse of discretion
- “When a defendant moves for or consents to a mistrial, the Double Jeopardy Clause usually imposes no bar to retrying that defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miner, Katzmann, Murtha
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.