· 2/10/1975
United States v. Raymond Wertis
Citations
- 505 F.2d 683
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming exclusion of testimony by psychiatrist on whether a witness could distinguish truth from fiction
- “[n]or . does appellant appear to have been harmed by the timing of disclosure”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gewin, Ainsworth, Gee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.