Skip to main content
· 2/10/1975

United States v. Raymond Wertis

Citations

  • 505 F.2d 683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming exclusion of testimony by psychiatrist on whether a witness could distinguish truth from fiction
  • “[n]or . does appellant appear to have been harmed by the timing of disclosure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gewin, Ainsworth, Gee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.