United States v. Raymond Paul Matthews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that burglary of the curtilage is a violent felony under ACCA's residual provision
• holding that a Florida conviction for burglary of the curtilage constituted a violent felony under the ACCA’s residual clause
• holding that a defendant who was not convicted of generic burglary was nevertheless convicted of violent crimes under the ACCA’s residual clause
• holding that Florida third-degree burglary qualified as a predicate offense under the residual clause of the ACCA’s violent felony definition
• acknowledging that a generic burglary conviction qualifies under the enumerated crimes clause and explaining that burglary convictions not proven to constitute generic burglary qualify under ACCA’s residual clause
• “Florida does not consider burglary of the curtilage of a structure to be a crime distinct from burglary of that structure. ...”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).