Skip to main content
· 2/28/1991

United States v. Raymond P. Allard

Citations

  • 926 F.2d 1237
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 3220
  • 1991 WL 23738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the fact that a \witness against [the defendant] is no longer available to testify\ \clearly . . . constitutes the kind of prejudice that may be considered under . . . the 'fair and just reason' standard\
  • explaining that \a delay that prejudices the government's case is a factor weighing against withdrawal\ when \the defendant can be blamed for the delay\
  • explaining that the Rule 11 procedure aims to ensure that the defendant understands the charge and the consequences of the plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Bownes, Torres

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.