United States v. Raymond March

Oral argument

• Argued

  24 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the crew leader was an employee of the defendants, thus, vitiating the necessity for the joint employer inquiry
• comparing the FLSA recordkeeping requirement, which “contains no private enforcement mechanism,” to the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act, which creates a statutory penalty for failing to keep records
• describing grower control through non-supervisory activities vis a vis the field workers
• the FLSA “contains no private enforcement mechanism if the employer fails to maintain such records”
• defendants’ testimony established that he was aware of the Act’s requirements
• “The standard for an intentional violation has also been referred to as ‘the common civil standard which holds a person liable for the natural consequences of his or her acts.’” (quoting DeLeon v. Ramirez, 465 F. Supp. 698, 705 (S.D.N.Y.1979))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).