United States v. Raymond L. Whitehead

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• joinder improper when both defendants participated in similar offenses with common third defendant, because government failed to prove connection between offenses
• joinder improper when both defendants participated in similar offenses with common third defendant, because government failed to prove connection between offenses
• misjoinder of defendants is per se impermissible
• misjoinder of defendants is per se impermissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).