United States v. Raymond Joseph Coin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that returning embezzled funds is not a defense to embezzlement because that crime is “complete when the ... embezzlement occurs”
• “The intent to return property is not a defense to embezzlement . . . nor to misapplication of funds . . . Such crimes are complete when the misapplication or embezzlement occurs.”
• “intent to return property is not a defense to embezzlement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).