· 9/8/2015
United States v. Raymond Edward Braun
Citations
- 801 F.3d 1301
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15908
- 2015 WL 5201729
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Supreme Court . . . made clear [in Curtis Johnson] that ‘physical force’ . . . requires violent contact beyond a mere touching.”
- “We are bound by federal law when we interpret terms in the [Armed Career Criminal Act]”
- “We are bound by federal law when we interpret terms in the ACCA and we are bound by state law when we interpret the elements of state-law crimes.”
- applying Johnson on direct appeal
- applying Johnson on direct appeal
- applying Johnson on direct appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carnes, Cox, Royal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.