United States v. Raymond Demilia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding both that a traffic stop is considered a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes and that a traffic stop without probable cause can violate the Fourth Amendment
• reviewing whether a traffic stop was “objective[ly] . . . justifi[ed]”
• “[A] right—such as the right to have recourse to a legal rule or argument—is waived when it is intentionally relinquished or abandoned.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[P]robable cause for the arrest still exists as long as the facts known to the officer would provide probable cause to arrest for the violation of some other law.”
• “Under our waiver jurisprudence, a right— such as the right to have recourse to a legal rule or argument—is waived when it is intentionally relinquished or abandoned.” (quotation marks omitted)
• “Under our waiver jurisprudence, a right—such as the right to have recourse to a legal rule or argument—is waived when it is intentionally relinquished or abandoned.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).