United States v. Raul Perez-Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence that the illegal aliens “were also clearly attempting to evade the law” supported the jury’s verdict that the defendant had intentionally transported them
• concluding that evidence that the illegal aliens “were also clearly attempting to evade the law” supported the jury’s verdict that the defendant had intentionally transported them
• “We may find sufficient evidence even though the circumstantial evidence does not remove every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt.”
• “We may find sufficient evidence even though the circumstantial evidence does not remove every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt.”
• interpreting the criminal alien smuggling statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).