United States v. Raul Maisonet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding First Amendment requirements satisfied because the jury was “charged . . . that the government was required to prove . . . that [the defendant] intended [the communication] to be such a threat”
• finding First Amendment requirements satisfied because the jury was “charged . . . that the government was required to prove . . . that [the defendant] intended [the communication] to be such a threat”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).