United States v. Raul Estremera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming verdict where defendant moved for a mistrial, it was granted, the defendant then withdrew the motion, and the case was resumed
• affirming verdict where defendant moved for a mistrial, it was granted, the defendant then withdrew the motion, and the case was resumed
• affirming verdict where defendant moved for a mistrial, it was granted, the defendant then withdrew the motion, and the case was resumed
• that a fabric is “normally flammable” under the Flammable Fabrics Act is evidence that the fabric is not unreasonably dangerous
• government’s mistaken reliance on deportation rather than extradition did not negate good faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).