United States v. Rauda-Bonilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that decisionmaker’s remark that he was paying a lot of money to the plaintiff and wondered if it was justified given her condition was not direct evidence
• considering employee’s claim based on multiple sclerosis and commenting “mere knowledge of [a] disability does not equate with discrimination”
• considering employee’s claim based on multiple sclerosis and commenting “mere knowledge of [a] disability does not equate with discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).