Skip to main content
· 9/26/1991

United States v. Rashmi R. Kant

Citations

  • 946 F.2d 267
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22435
  • 1991 WL 188741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • using, with- out protest from the defendant, corporate benefit as the measure of \benefit received\
  • defendant's sentence must be enhanced based on net value of improper benefit accruing to him and his two co- conspirators
  • improper benefit was amount accruing to defendant as well as his two co-conspirators

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Wilkins, Niemeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.