Skip to main content
· 6/2/1994

United States v. Raoul Barrie Clymer

Citations

  • 25 F.3d 824
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3968
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 7434
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12771
  • 1994 WL 234546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellate court should in certain cases determine prejudice
  • “Even giving the government the benefit of every doubt, about five months of this period was not excludable under the Act. Were we forced to decide how much of the delay is actually excluda-ble, we might conclude that the non-ex- dudable delay is considerably more than that.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Nelson, Kaufman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.