United States v. Rangel-Portillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assigning little weight to various factors that do not create reasonable suspicion in their totality
• finding most “indicative of a stop lacking in reasonable suspicion . . . in this case . . . is what is missing from the record”
• weighing individual factors to determine what each added to the reasonable suspicion analysis
• weighing individual factors to determine what each added to the reasonable suspicion analysis
• stop within 500 yards of border was not supported by reasonable suspicion even where stop was conducted in area known for illegal alien smuggling
• “What is more indicative of a stop lacking in reasonable suspicion is . . . what is missing from the record. In the current case, . . . the time of the stop was not suspicious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).