Skip to main content
· 6/20/1997

United States v. Randy M. Depoister

Citations

  • 116 F.3d 292
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 15022
  • 1997 WL 340549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reciting factors to consider, and noting that they will deserve varying weight depending on the facts at hand
  • reciting factors to consider, and noting that they will deserve varying weight depending on the facts at hand
  • no abuse of discretion to deny continuance where the defendant previously had received three continuances and where documents defense counsel allegedly had been unable to review were readily accessible
  • no abuse of discretion where trial judge declined to grant continuance where defendant had received three continuances and where relevant discovery had been made available and readily accessible to defendant
  • no abuse of discretion where trial judge declined to grant continuance where defendant had received three continuances and where relevant discovery had been made available and readily accessible to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Manton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.