United States v. Ramon Sandoval-Barajas, -Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a state conviction not to be an offense described in S 922(g)(5) on other grounds
• “The subsection at issue used the phrase ‘as described in’ rather than ‘as defined in.’”
• “Plainly the offense is not ‘defined in’ the federal and state statute in the same way. But the federal statute says that this federal crime only has to be ‘described in’ the state statute . . . .” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).