United States v. Ramon Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[De- fendants] did not need to renew their Rule 29 motions in or- der to preserve their challenges because they did not present evidence.”
• “[The defendants] did not need to renew their Rule 29 motions in order to preserve their challenges because they did not present evidence.”
• “[U]nder Rule 902(11), the authenticity of business records may be established by written declaration of the custodian provided to opposing counsel a reasonable time before trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).