United States v. Ralph Conti and David Newman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \(c)harging alternative ways of violating a statute in the conjunctive is permissible\
• “[c]harging alternative ways of violating- a statute in the conjunctive is permissible”
• “ . . . the use of the present tense” indicates that information was supplied close to the time of the affidavit
• where the affiant personally placed bets with the defendant
• where the affiant personally placed bets with the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).