United States v. Ralph Berndt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, while “no weapons were found in [the defendant’s] possession,” the defendant’s traveling to the victim’s home and lurking in her backyard were sufficient to warrant a § 2A6.1(b)(1) enhancement
• affirming sentencing enhancement imposed based on factual stipulations in plea agreement, despite defendant’s argument that enhancement was inapplicable
• affirming 5 sentence and finding that district courtʹs failure to provide defendant access to a victim letter was harmless error
• upholding enhancement based upon defendant traveling from Germany to victim’s home and entering her property without permission
• trial court improperly failed to give defendant opportunity to comment on information used in sentencing, but impropriety was harmless when defendant failed to establish that it could have changed result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).