Skip to main content
· 12/16/2011

United States v. Raifsnider

Citations

  • 663 F.3d 1004
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24978
  • 2011 WL 6263312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding oral promise was binding despite integration clause in plea agreement because both parties agreed they orally amended the written agreement
  • “party asserting the breach [of plea agreement] has the burden of establishing it”
  • issues concerning the interpretation and enforcement of a plea agreement are reviewed de novo; in determining whether plea agreement has been breached, this court applies general contract principles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Colloton, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.