· 12/16/2011
United States v. Raifsnider
Citations
- 663 F.3d 1004
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24978
- 2011 WL 6263312
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding oral promise was binding despite integration clause in plea agreement because both parties agreed they orally amended the written agreement
- “party asserting the breach [of plea agreement] has the burden of establishing it”
- issues concerning the interpretation and enforcement of a plea agreement are reviewed de novo; in determining whether plea agreement has been breached, this court applies general contract principles
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Colloton, Gruender
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.