United States v. Raichle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a neighbor’s testimony that the petitioner’s use was an “eyesore” and a realtor’s statement that the existence of the structure would affect the marketability of the neighbor’s home were “fatal” to petitioner’s application for a special use permit
• “[T]he Board is not required to produce evidence sufficient to persuade the finder of fact that its actions are reasonable by a preponderance of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).