Skip to main content
· 10/20/2014

United States v. Raghuveer Nayak

Citations

  • 769 F.3d 978
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 20068
  • 2014 WL 5318269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Skilling overturned Jain and citing Skilling , 561 U.S. at 413 n.45, 130 S.Ct. 2896
  • affirming mail fraud conviction of doctor who paid bribes and kickbacks to encourage other doc‐ tors to refer their patients
  • affirming mail fraud conviction of doctor who paid bribes and kickbacks to encourage referrals
  • liability results from the benefit to the defendant, not the harm to the victim
  • liability results from the benefit to the defendant, not the harm to the victim
  • liability results from the benefit to the defendant, not the harm to the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Rovner, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.