United States v. Rafiq Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The photographs . . . were not ‘witnesses’ against [the defendant and thus] did not ‘bear testimony’ by affirming anything with a ‘purpose.’”
• court may sua sponte consider issue of harmlessness where, among other things, the harmlessness of an error is certain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).