United States v. Rafael Sandoval-Villalvazo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the trial court was warranted in inferring that [the challenged coconspirator statements] were designed to keep potential buyers from leaving the scene and were, therefore, in furtherance of the conspiracy”
• reassurance during 3V2 hour wait that source would produce drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).