United States v. Rafael Collazo-Aponte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a facial challenge to 21 U.S.C. § 841 because \there is nothing in the statutory language that explicitly defies Apprendi\
• “[N]othing in the statutory language of § 841(b) supports a mens rea requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).