United States v. Rafael A. Urena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the defendant’s contention that the district court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal “amount[ed] to a simple hearsay objection”
• noting that the defendant’s contention that the district court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal “amount[ed] to a simple hearsay objection”
• court took into account “that there were several instances in which defendant answered questions before they were translated”
• by stopping the proceedings to ensure that an inaccurate translation was fully corrected, “the trial court clearly was sensitive to potential translation problems”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).