United States v. Racz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that noise associated with military overflights destroyed the value of property for residential use
• concluding that noise created by overflights “ ‘practically] destroyed]’ ” the property and decreased its market value, which resulted in a taking (quoting Aaron v. United States, 160 Ct.Cl. 295, 311 F.2d 798, 801 (1963))
• finding that the United States took private land without violating the landowner's airspace because its overflights were \peculiarly burdensome\ to the landowner
• allowing recovery although the overflights were wholly within navigable airspace that the United States had a right to occupy
• describing similar aircraft landing exercises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).