United States v. R. Michael Crowson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A more difficult question is what proof or procedures the government must employ to carry its burden of showing that it made no non-evidentiary use of the immunized testimony.”
• documents, as well as fact that investigation into substantive offenses had been substantially completed by the time of immunized testimony, supported court’s finding of prior independent source for evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).