United States v. R. Hillier's Son Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, inter alia, two-year delay in surgery despite plaintiffs repeated complaints of pain could support finding of deliberate indifference
• holding that a two year delay in arranging necessary surgery could support a finding of deliberate indifference
• holding that “the fact that [defendant] frequently examined [plaintiff does not] necessarily vindicate [defendant]” where “[t]he course of treatment [plaintiff] received clearly did not alleviate his suffering”
• noting that standard contemplates “a condition of urgency, one that may produce death, degeneration, or extreme pain”
• noting that standard contemplates “a condition of urgency, one that may produce death, degeneration, or extreme pain”
• noting that standard contemplates “a condition of urgency, one that may produce death, degeneration, or extreme pain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).