· 3/8/2011
United States v. Qurashi
Citations
- 634 F.3d 699
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4508
- 2011 WL 781608
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that 25 Dolan permits us to take into account claimed prejudices resulting from delays
- appropriate for restitution order to compensate for the “losses that result from the deprivation of the victim’s ability to put its money to productive use”
- “We hold that the MVRA allows a sentencing court to award prejudgment interest in a criminal restitution order to ensure compensation ‘in the full amount of each victim’s losses.’” (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3664(f)(1)(A))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Walker, Pooler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.