Skip to main content
· 3/8/2011

United States v. Qurashi

Citations

  • 634 F.3d 699
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4508
  • 2011 WL 781608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that 25 Dolan permits us to take into account claimed prejudices resulting from delays
  • appropriate for restitution order to compensate for the “losses that result from the deprivation of the victim’s ability to put its money to productive use”
  • “We hold that the MVRA allows a sentencing court to award prejudgment interest in a criminal restitution order to ensure compensation ‘in the full amount of each victim’s losses.’” (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3664(f)(1)(A))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Walker, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.