United States v. Quinney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring proof that the information “ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered” (quoting United States v. Alexander, 540 F.3d 494, 502 (6th Cir. 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Juan Collazo
  Sixth Circuit· 2016-03-29· cited 58×
• United States v. Charles Ickes
  Sixth Circuit· 2019-04-25· cited 24×
• Miguel Rodriguez v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-12-10· cited 18×
• United States v. Anibal Figueredo-Diaz
  Sixth Circuit· 2013-06-05· cited 9×
• State of Tennessee v. Samantha Grissom Scott
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2021-02-23
• State of Tennessee v. Simon Dean Porter
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2021-10-26
• Garnett v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2023-10-24

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• Nix v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
• United States v. Scottie Ray Hurst
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-09-22· cited 288×
• United States v. Lee Erwin Johnson
  Sixth Circuit· 1994-05-02· cited 179×
• United States v. Arre Kennedy
  Sixth Circuit· 1995-09-25· cited 118×
• United States v. Thomas Griffin and Catherine Tucker
  Sixth Circuit· 1974-12-09· cited 92×
• United States v. David Buchanan
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-05-25· cited 85×
• United States v. Charles v. Leake
  Sixth Circuit· 1996-09-09· cited 83×
• United States v. Robert R. Haddix
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-02-09· cited 48×
• United States v. Alexander
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-08-18· cited 43×