Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 10/1/2009

United States v. Quinney

Citations

  • 583 F.3d 891
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21635
  • 2009 WL 3126177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring proof that the information “ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered” (quoting United States v. Alexander, 540 F.3d 494, 502 (6th Cir. 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilman, Cook, Farris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.