Sixth Circuit· 10/1/2009
United States v. Quinney
Citations
- 583 F.3d 891
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21635
- 2009 WL 3126177
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring proof that the information “ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered” (quoting United States v. Alexander, 540 F.3d 494, 502 (6th Cir. 2008))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilman, Cook, Farris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.