United States v. Quincy Richard, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding indictment for bribery sufficient even though it did not include which transaction was the subject of a bribe or the name of the person involved in the bribe because it “track[ed] the language” of the statute
• finding a school board superintendent position to be worth $5,000 or more based on the $5,000 bribe amount
• accepting as sufficient evidence testimony explaining local school district received over $18 million in federal funds, but not requiring additional evidence tracing the funds to specific school programs
• affirming thirty-three month sentence for soliciting and accepting $10,000 in bribes
• mentioning sixty-month sentence for accepting $10,000 to $20,000 in bribes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).