United States v. Quantity of Distilled Spirits

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant’s argument in favor of a new trial “solely for the purpose of applying what he perceives to be the more favorable impeachment provisions applicable under the Federal Rules of Evidence” as opposed to those that governed under the Uniform Rules of Evidence
• the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands affirmed the trial court conclusion that Dr. Kolodchak testified at trial as a treating physician, not as an expert witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).