Skip to main content
· 1/7/2000

United States v. Purvis H. Gormley

Citations

  • 201 F.3d 290
  • 85 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 514
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 151
  • 2000 WL 14467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not err in imposing an obstruction of justice enhancement where defendant's false statements went beyond \merely denying his guilt\
  • concluding that district court erred in finding that tax preparation as practiced by defendant was special skill
  • holding that the district court did not err in imposing an obstruction of justice enhancement where defendant's false statements went beyond \merely denying his guilt\
  • concluding that the district court \erred in its interpretation of the guidelines by con- cluding that tax preparation as practiced by [the defendant] is a spe- cial skill\ under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3
  • \[T]he question of willfulness is essentially a finding of fact.\
  • state of mind is question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, King, Butzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.