United States v. Purdue Pharma L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Beginning in 2002 and continuing for the next several years, the government sought millions of documents from Purdue and conducted hundreds of interviews, some of which pertained to the relative potency and cost of OxyContin and MS Contin.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he consent of the Government is not a necessary condition precedent to enforcement of an otherwise valid release where such a release is executed prior to filing a qui tam action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).