United States v. Puga-Huerta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding “the forfeiture of certain funds twice—once as proceeds of mail and wire fraud and once as property involved in money laundering”
• criminal forfeiture under § 982

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).