United States v. Property Identified as 3120 Banneker Drive, N.E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[i]n contrast to the criminal forfeiture laws, where conviction is a prerequisite for forfeiture of the property . . . a property is subject to civil forfeiture even if its owner is acquitted of—or never called to defend against—criminal charges.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).