Skip to main content
· 11/9/1984

United States v. Properties Described in Complaints

Citations

  • 612 F. Supp. 465
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “Claim and Answer” did not meet the requirements of Rule C(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert H. Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.