· 9/9/2002
United States v. Proffit
Citations
- 304 F.3d 1001
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18512
- 2002 WL 31009343
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the defendant’s repeated offenses committing the same or similar crimes warranted a higher sentence because of the defendant’s potential for recidivism
- noting that the defendant’s repeated offenses committing the same or similar crimes warranted a higher sentence because of the defendant’s potential for recidivism
- noting, as to a Guidelines sentencing challenge, that the defendant “must clear the difficult hurdle of clearly erroneous review”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, McKAY, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.