Skip to main content
· 9/9/2002

United States v. Proffit

Citations

  • 304 F.3d 1001
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18512
  • 2002 WL 31009343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant’s repeated offenses committing the same or similar crimes warranted a higher sentence because of the defendant’s potential for recidivism
  • noting that the defendant’s repeated offenses committing the same or similar crimes warranted a higher sentence because of the defendant’s potential for recidivism
  • noting, as to a Guidelines sentencing challenge, that the defendant “must clear the difficult hurdle of clearly erroneous review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, McKAY, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.