United States v. Prochilo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when the government “maintains that it has turned over all material impeachment evidence, speculation is insufficient to permit even an in camera review of the requested materials”
• explaining that defendant's Brady showing \cannot consist of mere speculation\
• “To justify [in camera] review, the defendant must make some showing that the materials in question could contain favorable, material evidence. This showing cannot consist of mere speculation.” (citations omitted)
• citing, inter alia, Brady, 373 U.S. at 87
• “This showing cannot consist of mere speculation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).